Isabel Wiseler-Lima
European People's Party (EPP) · CSV
Details
How they were elected
- List
- Chrëschtlech Sozial Vollekspartei (CSV)52,849 voter equivalents, 22.9%, 2 seats
- Position on the list
- 2
- Personal votes
- 23,5387.4% of the list's votes
- Electoral rule
- In Luxembourg, personal votes for candidates decide, fully or in part, which of a list's candidates win its seats.
List share and seats: European Parliament, 2024 European election results (results.elections.europa.eu); list votes: sum of the local results in BLUE_EP (Hublet 2024), which matches the official share. Position on the list and personal votes: Bureau principal, procès-verbal du recensement général of 14 June 2024 (https://elections.public.lu), collected on 13 October 2026. Shares of the list's votes calculated by Parliament Radar.
Where the votes came from
Where the Chrëschtlech Sozial Vollekspartei (CSV) list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 100 communes: 52,849 voter equivalents (votes divided by 6 because each voter has 6 votes), 22.9% of valid votes.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- Lac de la Haute-SûreWiltz32.0% · 326
- TroisviergesClervaux30.4% · 362
- ClervauxClervaux30.2% · 764
- Rosport-MompachEchternach30.0% · 550
- WincrangeClervaux29.9% · 671
Results by commune: BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0), compiled from the official results. In Luxembourg each voter has 6 votes; the counts here are per voter (the list's votes divided by 6), so the shares match the official result. Municipal boundaries: Administration du cadastre et de la topographie (ACT), Limites administratives du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (communes, November 2023), CC0 1.0, simplified by Parliament Radar.
How Isabel Wiseler-Lima voted
Most recent first- Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
- Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
- Pericles V exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2028-2034
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/004 FI/Etelä-Suomi and Helsinki-Uusimaa paper - Finland
- Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Connecting Europe through high-speed rail
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Off the group line
17 of 352 comparable votes- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c): Monacolins from red yeast rice
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c): Certain botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 87460
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 94313
- Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions
- Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87705
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25
- Coordination of social security systems
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 94637
- Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton T304-40
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)
No vote matches the filter.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Isabel Wiseler-Lima's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Luxembourg
- Group
- European People's Party (EPP)
- National party
- CSV
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method