Independent project, not affiliated with the European Parliament.
Following Get it by e-mail
Votes › 20 October 2026 › B10-0471/2026

Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities

Rejected 199 for · 407 against · 45 abstentions · 68 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

How each group voted

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.
GroupForAbst.AgainstDid not voteCohesion
EPP401671498%
S&D927241275%
PfE02851565%
ECR40701095%
Renew13059682%
Greens/EFA4710598%
The Left3710797%
ESN0120695%
NI27163n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs
ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

This vote needed a majority of all members (objection to a delegated act).

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

About this vote

Reference: B10-0471/2026
Procedure: 2026/2819(DEA)
Committee: ENVI
20 October 2026, 12:30 · Strasbourg plenary

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.