Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
Rejected 93 for · 480 against · 2 abstentions · 144 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119). The final vote on this file: Provisional agreement, adopted 477 to 59 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 1 | 0 | 140 | 44 | 99% |
| S&D | 2 | 0 | 107 | 26 | 98% |
| PfE | 0 | 0 | 71 | 13 | 100% |
| ECR | 0 | 0 | 63 | 21 | 100% |
| Renew | 0 | 1 | 65 | 12 | 98% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 100% |
| NI | 7 | 1 | 13 | 7 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0104/2026
Procedure: 2025/0531(COD)
Committee: ENVI, IMCO
22 October 2026, 12:17 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Provisional agreement (final vote): adopted, 477 for · 59 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.