Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 94637
Adopted 412 for · 145 against · 11 abstentions · 151 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 50 | 4 | 87 | 44 | 62% |
| S&D | 102 | 5 | 1 | 27 | 94% |
| PfE | 55 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 85% |
| ECR | 55 | 0 | 13 | 13 | 81% |
| Renew | 30 | 1 | 29 | 17 | 50% |
| Greens/EFA | 39 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 93% |
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100% |
| ESN | 22 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| NI | 22 | 1 | 2 | 5 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0186/2026
Procedure: 2026/2651(RSP)
Committee: ENVI
29 April 2026, 14:03 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.