Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
Adopted 474 for · 82 against · 28 abstentions · 135 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 142 | 0 | 1 | 42 | 99% |
| S&D | 109 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 98% |
| PfE | 55 | 17 | 0 | 12 | 76% |
| ECR | 64 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 98% |
| Renew | 64 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 96% |
| Greens/EFA | 3 | 0 | 43 | 7 | 94% |
| The Left | 0 | 7 | 30 | 8 | 81% |
| ESN | 21 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| NI | 16 | 2 | 4 | 6 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0276/2026
Procedure: 2026/0211(COD)
Committee: ENVI
22 October 2026, 12:20 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6=
7=): rejected, 94 for · 482 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.