Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive
Rejected 314 for · 276 against · 17 abstentions · 112 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 6 | 2 | 158 | 18 | 95% |
| S&D | 32 | 11 | 63 | 29 | 59% |
| PfE | 60 | 0 | 8 | 17 | 88% |
| ECR | 43 | 0 | 21 | 20 | 67% |
| Renew | 44 | 0 | 24 | 10 | 65% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 94% |
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 97% |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100% |
| NI | 23 | 1 | 1 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
This vote needed a majority of all members (second reading). Majority not reached: it had more votes for than against and was still rejected.
By country
About this vote
Reference: C10-0178/2026
Procedure: 2025/0429(COD)
Committee: LIBE
9 July 2026, 12:21 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection: rejected, 276 for · 286 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.