Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c): Certain botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives
Rejected 282 for · 259 against · 23 abstentions · 155 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 111 | 7 | 24 | 42 | 78% |
| S&D | 7 | 1 | 87 | 40 | 92% |
| PfE | 65 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| ECR | 66 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 97% |
| Renew | 1 | 11 | 57 | 9 | 83% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 0 | 45 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 1 | 36 | 8 | 97% |
| ESN | 21 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 91% |
| NI | 11 | 1 | 8 | 8 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
This vote needed a majority of all members (objection to a Commission measure under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny). Majority not reached: it had more votes for than against and was still rejected.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0465/2026
Procedure: 2026/2839(RPS)
Committee: ENVI
8 October 2026, 12:04 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.