Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 87460
Adopted 433 for · 159 against · 10 abstentions · 115 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 48 | 4 | 95 | 37 | 65% |
| S&D | 105 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 91% |
| PfE | 59 | 0 | 8 | 17 | 88% |
| ECR | 61 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 81% |
| Renew | 35 | 2 | 29 | 12 | 53% |
| Greens/EFA | 44 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 92% |
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| ESN | 19 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 95% |
| NI | 24 | 1 | 1 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0381/2026
Procedure: 2026/2784(RSP)
Committee: ENVI
16 September 2026, 13:49 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.