Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
Rejected 94 for · 482 against · 1 abstentions · 142 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=). The final vote on this file: Commission proposal, 474 to 82 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 0 | 0 | 142 | 43 | 100% |
| S&D | 3 | 0 | 107 | 25 | 97% |
| PfE | 6 | 0 | 64 | 14 | 91% |
| ECR | 0 | 0 | 64 | 20 | 100% |
| Renew | 0 | 0 | 67 | 11 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 44 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100% |
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 100% |
| NI | 4 | 1 | 17 | 6 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0276/2026
Procedure: 2026/0211(COD)
Committee: ENVI
22 October 2026, 12:18 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Commission proposal (final vote): adopted, 474 for · 82 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.