Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 94313
Adopted 457 for · 184 against · 10 abstentions · 66 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 48 | 5 | 112 | 19 | 68% |
| S&D | 113 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 90% |
| PfE | 66 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 87% |
| ECR | 58 | 0 | 17 | 9 | 77% |
| Renew | 33 | 3 | 33 | 9 | 48% |
| Greens/EFA | 50 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| NI | 26 | 0 | 1 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0379/2026
Procedure: 2026/2782(RSP)
Committee: ENVI
16 September 2026, 13:48 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.