Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c): Monacolins from red yeast rice
Rejected 291 for · 276 against · 13 abstentions · 139 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 121 | 7 | 19 | 37 | 82% |
| S&D | 0 | 1 | 98 | 36 | 99% |
| PfE | 63 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 96% |
| ECR | 69 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 97% |
| Renew | 1 | 3 | 65 | 9 | 94% |
| Greens/EFA | 2 | 0 | 44 | 7 | 96% |
| The Left | 0 | 1 | 36 | 8 | 97% |
| ESN | 24 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 11 | 1 | 9 | 7 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
This vote needed a majority of all members (objection to a Commission measure under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny). Majority not reached: it had more votes for than against and was still rejected.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0466/2026
Procedure: 2026/2821(RPS)
Committee: ENVI
8 October 2026, 12:05 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.