Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
Adopted 651 for · 17 against · 3 abstentions · 48 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 166 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 98% |
| S&D | 130 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 99% |
| PfE | 74 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 92% |
| ECR | 71 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 93% |
| Renew | 73 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 99% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 98% |
| The Left | 44 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100% |
| ESN | 24 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 23 | 3 | 0 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0274/2026
Procedure: 2026/0284(BUD)
Committee: BUDG
21 October 2026, 12:40 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.