Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
Adopted 454 for · 34 against · 93 abstentions · 138 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 139 | 0 | 2 | 44 | 99% |
| S&D | 112 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 100% |
| PfE | 16 | 41 | 15 | 12 | 57% |
| ECR | 29 | 28 | 7 | 20 | 45% |
| Renew | 67 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| The Left | 34 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 94% |
| ESN | 0 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 81% |
| NI | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0257/2026
Procedure: 2025/0222(COD)
Committee: CULT
22 October 2026, 12:16 · Strasbourg plenary
Explanations of vote
MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.
- Małgorzata GosiewskaECR · PolandText and video →
- Bogdan RzońcaECR · PolandText and video →
- Katri KulmuniRenew · FinlandText and video →
Verbatim report of the European Parliament. © European Union, 2026 - Source: European Parliament.
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.