Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87705
Adopted 466 for · 175 against · 16 abstentions · 62 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 64 | 2 | 109 | 10 | 62% |
| S&D | 110 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 89% |
| PfE | 58 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 82% |
| ECR | 59 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 82% |
| Renew | 37 | 4 | 33 | 4 | 50% |
| Greens/EFA | 49 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| ESN | 24 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 96% |
| NI | 24 | 2 | 0 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0244/2025
Procedure: 2025/2647(RSP)
Committee: ENVI
8 July 2026, 12:58 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.