Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25
Adopted 463 for · 164 against · 21 abstentions · 71 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 57 | 6 | 106 | 18 | 63% |
| S&D | 118 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 96% |
| PfE | 62 | 0 | 12 | 10 | 84% |
| ECR | 61 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 86% |
| Renew | 31 | 1 | 35 | 8 | 52% |
| Greens/EFA | 37 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 82% |
| The Left | 43 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100% |
| NI | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0109/2026
Procedure: 2026/2519(RSP)
Committee: ENVI
11 February 2026, 12:27 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.