Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9
Adopted 417 for · 167 against · 15 abstentions · 120 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 53 | 2 | 104 | 26 | 65% |
| S&D | 99 | 6 | 8 | 22 | 88% |
| PfE | 52 | 0 | 11 | 22 | 82% |
| ECR | 56 | 2 | 11 | 15 | 81% |
| Renew | 32 | 3 | 33 | 10 | 48% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| ESN | 21 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 96% |
| NI | 19 | 1 | 0 | 7 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0336/2026
Procedure: 2026/2746(RSP)
Committee: ENVI
8 July 2026, 12:59 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.