Markéta Gregorová
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA) · PIR
Details
How they were elected
- List
- Česká pirátská strana184,091 votes, 6.2%, 1 seat
- Position on the list
- 2
- Personal votes
- 23,38812.7% of the list's votes
- Electoral rule
- In Czechia, voters choose a party list and can mark up to two of its candidates; candidates with personal votes from at least 5% of the list's votes move to the top of the list (Act No. 62/2003 Coll.).
Czech Statistical Office (volby.cz), 2024 European Parliament election, open data, CC BY 4.0. List votes, position on the list and personal votes: Czech Statistical Office (volby.cz), CC BY 4.0, and resolutions of the State Electoral Commission, collected on 13 October 2026.
Where the votes came from
Where the Česká pirátská strana list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 6,254 municipalities: 184,091 votes, 6.2% of valid votes.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- PrahaHlavní město Praha, Hlavní město Praha12.1% · 45,890
- ČernošicePraha-západ, Středočeský kraj11.7% · 344
- HoroměřicePraha-západ, Středočeský kraj11.4% · 151
- DobřichovicePraha-západ, Středočeský kraj11.2% · 153
- ŘevnicePraha-západ, Středočeský kraj10.6% · 138
Results by municipality: BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0), from the Czech Statistical Office (volby.cz). Municipal boundaries derived from the Office's polling-district boundaries, CC BY 4.0 (aggregated and simplified); the two blank areas are military training grounds with no polling district.
How Markéta Gregorová voted
Most recent first- Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
- Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
- Pericles V exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2028-2034
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/004 FI/Etelä-Suomi and Helsinki-Uusimaa paper - Finland
- Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Connecting Europe through high-speed rail
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Off the group line
18 of 358 comparable votes- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Monday's agenda - Request by The Left Group - Riots
- CO2 emission class of heavy-duty vehicles with trailers
- Impact of social media and the online environment on young people
- Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro
- Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances
- A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning
- Temporary support and payment of advances regarding the increased fertiliser prices due to the Middle East crisis
- Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba
- Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed
- Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods
- Generalised scheme of tariff preferences
- Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods
- Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods: Proposal for rejection (amendment 17)
- Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America: Proposal for rejection (amendment 47)
- Copyright and generative artificial intelligence - opportunities and challenges
- Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts
No vote matches the filter.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Markéta Gregorová's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Czechia
- Group
- Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
- National party
- PIR
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method