Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances
Adopted 367 for · 240 against · 59 abstentions · 51 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 139 | 1 | 36 | 8 | 79% |
| S&D | 114 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 89% |
| PfE | 6 | 2 | 66 | 10 | 89% |
| ECR | 17 | 1 | 58 | 8 | 76% |
| Renew | 64 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 88% |
| Greens/EFA | 8 | 28 | 13 | 4 | 57% |
| The Left | 9 | 23 | 7 | 5 | 59% |
| ESN | 2 | 1 | 23 | 1 | 88% |
| NI | 8 | 3 | 14 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: EPP. Without the votes of this group on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0230/2026
Procedure: 2026/0085(COD)
Committee: ENVI
15 September 2026, 12:24 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.