Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods: Proposal for rejection (amendment 17)
Rejected 159 for · 458 against · 23 abstentions · 78 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 17). The final vote on this file: Commission proposal, 437 to 144 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 4 | 0 | 165 | 15 | 98% |
| S&D | 10 | 1 | 99 | 25 | 90% |
| PfE | 40 | 13 | 30 | 2 | 48% |
| ECR | 2 | 0 | 73 | 6 | 97% |
| Renew | 13 | 0 | 54 | 10 | 81% |
| Greens/EFA | 20 | 1 | 27 | 5 | 56% |
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 97% |
| ESN | 18 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 67% |
| NI | 17 | 3 | 5 | 5 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0070/2026
Procedure: 2025/0260(COD)
Committee: INTA
26 March 2026, 11:26 · Brussels plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Commission proposal (final vote): adopted, 437 for · 144 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.