Independent project, not affiliated with the European Parliament.
Following Get it by e-mail
Votes › 17 September 2026 › A10-0220/2026

Impact of social media and the online environment on young people

Adopted 395 for · 136 against · 80 abstentions · 106 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

How each group voted

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.
GroupForAbst.AgainstDid not voteCohesion
EPP143833093%
S&D1150020100%
PfE045241565%
ECR310601182%
Renew61061191%
Greens/EFA4540492%
The Left2448867%
ESN1123292%
NI38125n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs
ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

About this vote

Reference: A10-0220/2026
Procedure: 2025/2081(INI)
Committee: CULT
17 September 2026, 12:23 · Strasbourg plenary

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.