Generalised scheme of tariff preferences
Adopted 459 for · 127 against · 70 abstentions · 63 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 135 | 8 | 24 | 18 | 81% |
| S&D | 116 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 95% |
| PfE | 60 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 78% |
| ECR | 31 | 41 | 4 | 5 | 54% |
| Renew | 71 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 21 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 46% |
| The Left | 6 | 2 | 34 | 4 | 81% |
| ESN | 1 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 96% |
| NI | 18 | 4 | 6 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A9-0147/2022
Procedure: 2021/0297(COD)
Committee: INTA
28 April 2026, 13:00 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 131): rejected, 39 for · 600 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.