Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America: Proposal for rejection (amendment 47)
Rejected 160 for · 462 against · 16 abstentions · 80 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 47). The final vote on this file: Commission proposal, 417 to 154 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 0 | 0 | 169 | 15 | 100% |
| S&D | 8 | 3 | 100 | 24 | 90% |
| PfE | 40 | 12 | 31 | 2 | 48% |
| ECR | 1 | 0 | 74 | 6 | 99% |
| Renew | 14 | 0 | 53 | 10 | 79% |
| Greens/EFA | 21 | 1 | 25 | 6 | 53% |
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| ESN | 20 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 77% |
| NI | 21 | 0 | 4 | 5 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0069/2026
Procedure: 2025/0261(COD)
Committee: INTA
26 March 2026, 11:21 · Brussels plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Commission proposal (final vote): adopted, 417 for · 154 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.