Independent project, not affiliated with the European Parliament.
Following Get it by e-mail
Votes › 17 June 2026 › A10-0175/2026

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed

Rejected 201 for · 431 against · 29 abstentions · 58 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

How each group voted

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.
GroupForAbst.AgainstDid not voteCohesion
EPP8131461887%
S&D304901173%
PfE17062678%
ECR18159476%
Renew10060886%
Greens/EFA3466774%
The Left4202196%
ESN2024177%
NI22322n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs
ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

This vote needed a majority of all members (second reading).

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

About this vote

Reference: A10-0175/2026
Procedure: 2023/0226(COD)
Committee: ENVI
17 June 2026, 12:44 · Strasbourg plenary

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.