Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed
Rejected 201 for · 431 against · 29 abstentions · 58 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 8 | 13 | 146 | 18 | 87% |
| S&D | 30 | 4 | 90 | 11 | 73% |
| PfE | 17 | 0 | 62 | 6 | 78% |
| ECR | 18 | 1 | 59 | 4 | 76% |
| Renew | 10 | 0 | 60 | 8 | 86% |
| Greens/EFA | 34 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 74% |
| The Left | 42 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 96% |
| ESN | 20 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 77% |
| NI | 22 | 3 | 2 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
This vote needed a majority of all members (second reading).
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0175/2026
Procedure: 2023/0226(COD)
Committee: ENVI
17 June 2026, 12:44 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.