Reinier Van Lanschot
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA) · Volt
Details
How they were elected
- List
- Volt Nederland319,483 votes, 5.1%, 2 seats
- Position on the list
- 1
- Personal votes
- 140,07343.8% of the list's votes
- Electoral rule
- In the Netherlands, personal votes for candidates decide, fully or in part, which of a list's candidates win its seats.
List share and seats: European Parliament, 2024 European election results (results.elections.europa.eu). List votes, position on the list and personal votes: Kiesraad (Electoral Council), official result of 19 June 2024 and EML open data, CC0 1.0, with appointments published in the Staatscourant, collected on 13 October 2026. Shares of the list's votes calculated by Parliament Radar.
Where the votes came from
Where the Volt Nederland list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 342 municipalities: 315,511 votes, 5.1% of valid votes. The 3,972 votes cast abroad or in the Caribbean Netherlands have no municipality and are not on the map.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- UtrechtUtrecht11.2% · 16,676
- AmsterdamNoord-Holland10.7% · 30,666
- BloemendaalNoord-Holland10.4% · 1,202
- DelftZuid-Holland10.4% · 4,243
- LeidenZuid-Holland10.1% · 5,524
Results by municipality: BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0), compiled from the official results. Municipal boundaries: Kadaster, Bestuurlijke Gebieden 2024, CC BY 4.0, simplified.
How Reinier Van Lanschot voted
Most recent first- Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
- Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
- Pericles V exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2028-2034
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/004 FI/Etelä-Suomi and Helsinki-Uusimaa paper - Finland
- Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Connecting Europe through high-speed rail
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Off the group line
15 of 350 comparable votes- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 87460
- EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime
- Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances
- Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed
- Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America
- Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures
- Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/008 BE/Liberty - Belgium
- EU-Norway Agreement on transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime
- EU-Iceland agreement on transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data to prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crime
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - Court of Auditors
- Copyright and generative artificial intelligence - opportunities and challenges
- Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)
No vote matches the filter.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Reinier Van Lanschot's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Netherlands
- Group
- Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
- National party
- Volt
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method