Votes › 21 May 2026 › A10-0137/2026

Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures

Adopted 294 for · 192 against · 90 abstentions · 141 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

Embed code

<iframe src="https://epradar.eu/en/embed/vote-193313" width="100%" height="680" style="border:0;max-width:640px" title="Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures" loading="lazy"></iframe>

How each group voted

EPP136 · 1 · 0

S&D90 · 0 · 16

PfE0 · 8 · 70

ECR1 · 59 · 7

Renew65 · 1 · 0

Greens/EFA1 · 17 · 24

The Left0 · 0 · 35

ESN0 · 2 · 22

NI1 · 2 · 18

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.

Group	For	Abst.	Against	Did not vote	Cohesion
EPP	136	1	0	46	99%
S&D	90	0	16	30	85%
PfE	0	8	70	7	90%
ECR	1	59	7	14	88%
Renew	65	1	0	11	98%
Greens/EFA	1	17	24	11	57%
The Left	0	0	35	10	100%
ESN	0	2	22	3	92%
NI	1	2	18	9	n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs

ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

Winning sideEPP, S&D, Renew
Losing sidePfE, Greens/EFA, The Left, ESN
AbstainedECR

Decisive: EPP. Without the votes of this group on the winning side, the result would have flipped.

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

Country Remember my country in this browser. Nothing is sent to us.

About this vote

Reference: A10-0137/2026
Procedure: 2025/0825(COD)
Committee: ECON
21 May 2026, 12:16 · Strasbourg plenary

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.