Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)
Adopted 334 for · 324 against · 11 abstentions · 50 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 43 | 2 | 135 | 7 | 75% |
| S&D | 35 | 0 | 90 | 11 | 72% |
| PfE | 72 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 90% |
| ECR | 35 | 0 | 39 | 5 | 53% |
| Renew | 24 | 0 | 46 | 5 | 66% |
| Greens/EFA | 36 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 74% |
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| ESN | 24 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 96% |
| NI | 27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: PfE, Greens/EFA, The Left, ESN. Without the votes of any one of these groups on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0060/2026
Procedure: 2026/2560(RSP)
Committee:
21 January 2026, 12:48 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Motion for a resolution: rejected, 225 for · 402 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.