Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle
Renew Europe · D66
Details
How they were elected
- List
- Democraten 66 (D66)523,650 votes, 8.4%, 3 seats
- Position on the list
- 2
- Personal votes
- 100,50419.2% of the list's votes
- Electoral rule
- In the Netherlands, personal votes for candidates decide, fully or in part, which of a list's candidates win its seats.
List share and seats: European Parliament, 2024 European election results (results.elections.europa.eu). List votes, position on the list and personal votes: Kiesraad (Electoral Council), official result of 19 June 2024 and EML open data, CC0 1.0, with appointments published in the Staatscourant, collected on 13 October 2026. Shares of the list's votes calculated by Parliament Radar.
Where the votes came from
Where the Democraten 66 (D66) list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 342 municipalities: 517,203 votes, 8.4% of valid votes. The 6,447 votes cast abroad or in the Caribbean Netherlands have no municipality and are not on the map.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- HeemstedeNoord-Holland16.3% · 2,077
- OegstgeestZuid-Holland15.6% · 1,880
- BeverwijkNoord-Holland15.2% · 1,828
- BloemendaalNoord-Holland15.0% · 1,739
- Gooise MerenNoord-Holland15.0% · 3,857
Results by municipality: BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0), compiled from the official results. Municipal boundaries: Kadaster, Bestuurlijke Gebieden 2024, CC BY 4.0, simplified.
How Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle voted
Most recent first- Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
- Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
- Pericles V exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2028-2034
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/004 FI/Etelä-Suomi and Helsinki-Uusimaa paper - Finland
- Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Connecting Europe through high-speed rail
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Off the group line
16 of 362 comparable votes- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25
- Recommendation on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the region
- Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)
- Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain
- Tuesday's agenda - Request by The Left Group - Israel's air strikes in Lebanon
- How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers' resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 94637
- Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton T304-40
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)
- Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino
No vote matches the filter.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Netherlands
- Group
- Renew Europe
- National party
- D66
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method