Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)
Adopted 418 for · 218 against · 30 abstentions · 53 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 166 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 98% |
| S&D | 9 | 11 | 106 | 9 | 84% |
| PfE | 79 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| ECR | 78 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| Renew | 37 | 12 | 21 | 8 | 53% |
| Greens/EFA | 2 | 0 | 44 | 7 | 96% |
| The Left | 0 | 0 | 43 | 2 | 100% |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100% |
| NI | 21 | 4 | 3 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0048/2026
Procedure: 2025/0059(COD)
Committee: LIBE
17 June 2026, 12:51 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 2 =
3 =): rejected, 198 for · 453 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.