Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
Rejected 228 for · 311 against · 92 abstentions · 87 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 22 | 5 | 137 | 20 | 84% |
| S&D | 95 | 2 | 8 | 30 | 90% |
| PfE | 40 | 24 | 19 | 2 | 48% |
| ECR | 27 | 35 | 12 | 7 | 47% |
| Renew | 33 | 6 | 29 | 9 | 48% |
| Greens/EFA | 3 | 11 | 33 | 6 | 70% |
| The Left | 4 | 0 | 33 | 9 | 89% |
| ESN | 0 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 89% |
| NI | 4 | 6 | 16 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: EPP. Without the votes of this group on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0040/2026
Procedure: 2025/0429(COD)
Committee: LIBE
26 March 2026, 11:18 · Brussels plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.