Irena Joveva
Renew Europe · GS
Details
How they were elected
- List
- Gibanje Svoboda149,200 votes, 22.1%, 2 seats
- Position on the list
- 1
- Personal votes
- 71,20547.7% of the list's votes
- Electoral rule
- In Slovenia, personal votes for candidates decide, fully or in part, which of a list's candidates win its seats.
List share and seats: European Parliament, 2024 European election results (results.elections.europa.eu). List votes, position on the list and personal votes: National Electoral Commission of Slovenia (DVK), official minutes published in Uradni list RS 53/2024, collected on 13 October 2026. Shares of the list's votes calculated by Parliament Radar.
Where the votes came from
Where the Gibanje Svoboda list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 88 electoral districts: 147,886 votes, 22.1% of valid votes. The 1,314 votes cast abroad have no electoral district and are not on the map.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- Hrastnik-TrbovljeZasavska32.2% · 2,434
- JeseniceGorenjska30.3% · 2,617
- Koper 1Obalno-kraška30.1% · 1,767
- Ljubljana Moste-Polje 2Osrednjeslovenska29.6% · 1,555
- Nova Gorica 2Goriška29.4% · 2,979
Results by electoral district: BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0), compiled from the official results. Electoral district boundaries: Surveying and Mapping Authority of the Republic of Slovenia, Register of Spatial Units, electoral districts (volilni okraji) valid on 9 June 2024, CC BY 4.0, simplified.
How Irena Joveva voted
Most recent first- Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
- Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
- Pericles V exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2028-2034
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/004 FI/Etelä-Suomi and Helsinki-Uusimaa paper - Finland
- Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Connecting Europe through high-speed rail
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Off the group line
16 of 339 comparable votes- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security
- Monday's agenda - Request by The Left Group - ECB
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9
- Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)
- Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation): Proposal for rejection (amendment 2 = 3 =)
- Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed
- Tuesday's agenda - Request by The Left Group - Israel's air strikes in Lebanon
- Tuesday's agenda - Request by the ECR Group - Attack against citizens in Modena
- How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers' resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?
- Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton T304-40
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)
- Motion of censure on the Commission
No vote matches the filter.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Irena Joveva's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Slovenia
- Group
- Renew Europe
- National party
- GS
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method