Sofie Eriksson
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) · S
Details
How they were elected
- List
- Socialdemokraterna1,039,676 votes, 24.8%, 5 seats
- Position on the list
- 5
- Personal votes
- 20,7802% of the list's votes
- Electoral rule
- In Sweden, personal votes for candidates decide, fully or in part, which of a list's candidates win its seats.
List share and seats: European Parliament, 2024 European election results (results.elections.europa.eu). List votes, position on the list and personal votes: Swedish Election Authority (Valmyndigheten), decision VAL-246-2024 and final results (https://resultat.val.se), collected on 13 October 2026. Shares of the list's votes calculated by Parliament Radar.
Where the votes came from
Where the Socialdemokraterna list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 290 municipalities: 1,039,676 votes, 24.8% of valid votes.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- ÖverkalixNorrbottens län44.6% · 478
- ArvidsjaurNorrbottens län44.5% · 923
- PiteåNorrbottens län43.7% · 7,435
- ÄlvsbynNorrbottens län43.6% · 1,117
- KalixNorrbottens län43.4% · 2,376
Results by municipality: BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0), compiled from the official results. Municipal boundaries: Statistics Sweden (SCB), Digitala gränser, CC0, simplified.
How Sofie Eriksson voted
Most recent first- Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
- Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
- Pericles V exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2028-2034
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/004 FI/Etelä-Suomi and Helsinki-Uusimaa paper - Finland
- Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Connecting Europe through high-speed rail
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Off the group line
21 of 337 comparable votes- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Recommendation on EU-China political relations
- Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up
- The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security
- Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure
- Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness
- Draft amending budget No 1/2026: entering the surplus of the financial year 2025
- Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)
- Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation): Proposal for rejection (amendment 2 = 3 =)
- How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers' resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?
- Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III
- Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034
- Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)
- Wednesday's agenda - Request by the PPE Group - Iran
- Establishing an EU talent pool
- Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products
- Application of the 'safe third country' concept
- Application of the 'safe third country' concept: Proposal for rejection (amendment 14= 15= 16=)
- Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level
No vote matches the filter.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Sofie Eriksson's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Sweden
- Group
- Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
- National party
- S
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method