Votes › 28 April 2026 › A10-0105/2026

Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034

Adopted 370 for · 201 against · 84 abstentions · 64 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

Embed code

<iframe src="https://epradar.eu/en/embed/vote-190026" width="100%" height="680" style="border:0;max-width:640px" title="Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034" loading="lazy"></iframe>

How each group voted

EPP143 · 8 · 13

S&D116 · 2 · 8

PfE0 · 18 · 57

ECR5 · 35 · 35

Renew54 · 10 · 7

Greens/EFA46 · 0 · 0

The Left3 · 8 · 32

ESN0 · 0 · 27

NI3 · 3 · 22

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.

Group	For	Abst.	Against	Did not vote	Cohesion
EPP	143	8	13	21	87%
S&D	116	2	8	9	92%
PfE	0	18	57	10	76%
ECR	5	35	35	6	47%
Renew	54	10	7	6	76%
Greens/EFA	46	0	0	7	100%
The Left	3	8	32	3	74%
ESN	0	0	27	0	100%
NI	3	3	22	2	n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs

ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

Winning sideEPP, S&D, Renew, Greens/EFA
Losing sidePfE, The Left, ESN
Split, no positionECR

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

Country Remember my country in this browser. Nothing is sent to us.

About this vote

Reference: A10-0105/2026
Procedure: 2025/0571R(APP)
Committee: BUDG
28 April 2026, 12:38 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 28 April 2026 (verbatim report and video)

Explanations of vote

MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.

João OliveiraThe Left · PortugalText and video →

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.