Application of the 'safe third country' concept: Proposal for rejection (amendment 14= 15= 16=)
Rejected 220 for · 396 against · 37 abstentions · 66 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 14= 15= 16=). The final vote on this file: Provisional agreement, adopted 396 to 226 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 0 | 9 | 168 | 10 | 95% |
| S&D | 92 | 10 | 19 | 14 | 76% |
| PfE | 0 | 0 | 71 | 13 | 100% |
| ECR | 0 | 0 | 73 | 6 | 100% |
| Renew | 35 | 15 | 17 | 8 | 52% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 98% |
| The Left | 42 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 100% |
| NI | 5 | 2 | 23 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0255/2025
Procedure: 2025/0132(COD)
Committee: LIBE
10 February 2026, 12:58 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Provisional agreement (final vote): adopted, 396 for · 226 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.