Establishing an EU talent pool
Adopted 414 for · 182 against · 21 abstentions · 101 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 148 | 3 | 9 | 26 | 92% |
| S&D | 107 | 2 | 11 | 15 | 89% |
| PfE | 7 | 0 | 57 | 20 | 89% |
| ECR | 31 | 0 | 41 | 7 | 57% |
| Renew | 62 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 94% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 98% |
| The Left | 10 | 14 | 14 | 8 | 37% |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 25 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 4 | 1 | 21 | 5 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0045/2025
Procedure: 2023/0404(COD)
Committee: LIBE
10 March 2026, 13:14 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 164=
165=
166=): rejected, 156 for · 462 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.