Ana Miguel Pedro
European People's Party (EPP) · CDS-PP
Details
How they were elected
- List
- Aliança Democrática (PSD, CDS-PP, PPM)1,229,895 votes, 31.7%, 7 seats
- Position on the list
- 3
- Electoral rule
- In Portugal, lists are closed: voters choose a party list, and seats go to its candidates in the order the party set.
National Elections Commission (CNE), Mapa Oficial n.º 4/2024. List votes, position on the list: National Elections Commission (CNE, Mapa Oficial n.º 4/2024) and the lists admitted by the Constitutional Court (Proc. 435/2024), collected on 13 October 2026.
Where the votes came from
Where the Aliança Democrática (PSD, CDS-PP, PPM) list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 3,092 parishes, from the provisional count: 1,221,504 votes, 31.8% of valid votes. The 7,283 votes cast abroad have no parish and are not on the map.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- Arco da CalhetaCalheta, Ilha da Madeira62.1% · 914
- CanhasPonta do Sol, Ilha da Madeira60.7% · 996
- CalhetaCalheta, Ilha da Madeira59.9% · 867
- Duas IgrejasParedes, Porto58.9% · 682
- União das freguesias de Santa Catarina da Serra e ChainçaLeiria, Leiria58.3% · 1,301
Provisional results supplied by SGMAI-AE (Ministry of Internal Administration), 2024 European Parliament election, collected on 9 October 2026; the same figures, parish by parish, are in BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0). The official result (National Elections Commission, Mapa Oficial n.º 4/2024) has national totals only: the provisional count is 0.08% lower in valid votes, and the seats are the same. Percentages, colour classes and sums calculated by Parliament Radar. Informação geográfica cedida pela Direção-Geral do Território (CAOP 2024, CC BY 4.0), simplified.
How Ana Miguel Pedro voted
Most recent first- Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
- Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
- Pericles V exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2028-2034
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/004 FI/Etelä-Suomi and Helsinki-Uusimaa paper - Finland
- Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Connecting Europe through high-speed rail
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Off the group line
13 of 326 comparable votes- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Impact of social media and the online environment on young people
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Lead in certain fishing tackle
- General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products
- Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap
- Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 94637
- The Commission's 2025 Rule of Law report
- Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- EU enlargement strategy
- Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers' rights
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)
No vote matches the filter.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Ana Miguel Pedro's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Portugal
- Group
- European People's Party (EPP)
- National party
- CDS-PP
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method