Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Lead in certain fishing tackle
Rejected 197 for · 455 against · 7 abstentions · 60 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 26 | 1 | 143 | 15 | 84% |
| S&D | 0 | 0 | 126 | 9 | 100% |
| PfE | 74 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| ECR | 71 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 93% |
| Renew | 0 | 0 | 71 | 7 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 0 | 50 | 3 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 1 | 39 | 5 | 98% |
| ESN | 13 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 50% |
| NI | 13 | 1 | 12 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
This vote needed a majority of all members (objection to a Commission measure under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny).
By country
About this vote
Reference: B10-0344/2026
Procedure: 2026/2714(RPS)
Committee: ENVI
8 July 2026, 12:12 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.