General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products
Adopted 325 for · 304 against · 29 abstentions · 61 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 143 | 8 | 18 | 16 | 85% |
| S&D | 3 | 7 | 113 | 12 | 92% |
| PfE | 76 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 97% |
| ECR | 72 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 92% |
| Renew | 15 | 1 | 55 | 7 | 78% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 0 | 45 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 0 | 42 | 3 | 100% |
| ESN | 4 | 2 | 18 | 3 | 75% |
| NI | 12 | 9 | 7 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: EPP, PfE, ECR. Without the votes of any one of these groups on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0160/2026
Procedure: 2025/0581(CNS)
Committee: ECON
17 June 2026, 13:01 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.