Kateřina Konečná
Non-attached members · KSČM
Details
How they were elected
- List
- STAČILO!, KSČM, SD-SN, ČSNS283,935 votes, 9.6%, 2 seats
- Position on the list
- 1
- Personal votes
- 115,38640.6% of the list's votes
- Electoral rule
- In Czechia, voters choose a party list and can mark up to two of its candidates; candidates with personal votes from at least 5% of the list's votes move to the top of the list (Act No. 62/2003 Coll.).
Czech Statistical Office (volby.cz), 2024 European Parliament election, open data, CC BY 4.0. List votes, position on the list and personal votes: Czech Statistical Office (volby.cz), CC BY 4.0, and resolutions of the State Electoral Commission, collected on 13 October 2026.
Where the votes came from
Where the STAČILO!, KSČM, SD-SN, ČSNS list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 6,254 municipalities: 283,935 votes, 9.6% of valid votes.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- Starý JičínNový Jičín, Moravskoslezský kraj24.6% · 286
- BruntálBruntál, Moravskoslezský kraj21.0% · 752
- PetřvaldKarviná, Moravskoslezský kraj20.4% · 379
- OrlováKarviná, Moravskoslezský kraj19.1% · 1,155
- OslavanyBrno-venkov, Jihomoravský kraj19.0% · 233
Results by municipality: BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0), from the Czech Statistical Office (volby.cz). Municipal boundaries derived from the Office's polling-district boundaries, CC BY 4.0 (aggregated and simplified); the two blank areas are military training grounds with no polling district.
How Kateřina Konečná voted
Most recent first- Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
- Cohesion policy in the EU's eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
- Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030: Proposal for rejection (amendment 6= 7=)
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
- Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products: Proposal for rejection (amendment 119)
- Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations
- Reduction of methane emissions in the energy sector: postponement of certain obligations: Proposal for rejection (amendment 1= 2=)
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769
- Boosting skills in the Union - opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition
- Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States
- Pericles V exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2028-2034
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/004 FI/Etelä-Suomi and Helsinki-Uusimaa paper - Finland
- Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026
- Discharge 2024: EU general budget - European Council and Council
- General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections
- Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Certification methodologies for carbon farming activities
- Connecting Europe through high-speed rail
- Combating VAT fraud - the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Kateřina Konečná's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Czechia
- Group
- Non-attached members
- National party
- KSČM
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method