Tom Berendsen
No group · MEP until 24 February 2026
Details
How they were elected
- List
- Christen-Democratisch Appèl (CDA)589,205 votes, 9.4%, 3 seats
- Position on the list
- 1
- Personal votes
- 366,45462.2% of the list's votes
- Electoral rule
- In the Netherlands, personal votes for candidates decide, fully or in part, which of a list's candidates win its seats.
List share and seats: European Parliament, 2024 European election results (results.elections.europa.eu). List votes, position on the list and personal votes: Kiesraad (Electoral Council), official result of 19 June 2024 and EML open data, CC0 1.0, with appointments published in the Staatscourant, collected on 13 October 2026. Shares of the list's votes calculated by Parliament Radar.
Where the votes came from
Where the Christen-Democratisch Appèl (CDA) list won votes in the 2024 European election
The map shows the share of valid votes won by this list in each of the 342 municipalities: 587,273 votes, 9.5% of valid votes. The 1,932 votes cast abroad or in the Caribbean Netherlands have no municipality and are not on the map.
Strongest areas (at least 1,000 valid votes)
- NederweertLimburg24.4% · 1,563
- WeertLimburg24.3% · 4,083
- AaltenGelderland23.7% · 2,573
- LeudalLimburg22.4% · 2,885
- OirschotNoord-Brabant22.0% · 1,614
Results by municipality: BLUE_EP (Hublet, F. (2024). BLUE_EP: A Dataset of Municipality-Level Results of European Parliament Elections. Codebook v1. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 10.5281/zenodo.14569325, CC BY 4.0), compiled from the official results. Municipal boundaries: Kadaster, Bestuurlijke Gebieden 2024, CC BY 4.0, simplified.
How Tom Berendsen voted
Most recent first- Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine
- Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire
- Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women
- Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers' rights
- Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy
- Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain
- Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts
- Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran
- Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton T304-40
- EU strategic defence and security partnerships
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6
- Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)
- Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino
- Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/006 BE/Audi - Belgium
- Amending the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027
- Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the Ukraine Support Loan for 2026 and 2027
- Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/792 establishing the Ukraine Facility
- European Central Bank - annual report 2025
No vote matches the filter.
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Votes in 2026
Alignment with each group
Share of Tom Berendsen's votes that matched each group's position
In Parliament
- Country
- Netherlands
- Group
- No group
- Term
- MEP until 24 February 2026
Compare with another MEP →Profile on the European Parliament website
Method
Participation: Share of the votes the Radar follows (HowTheyVote main votes and final roll-call votes) in which the MEP voted. Not attendance; excused absences are not counted. Winning side: Of the For and Against votes, the share on the side of the result: For when adopted, Against when rejected. Abstentions and absences are left out. Off the group line: a vote different from the position of the MEP's own group on that day; divided groups and non-attached members are left out. Full method