Votes › 12 February 2026 › A10-0260/2025

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Adopted 385 for · 141 against · 53 abstentions · 140 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

Embed code

<iframe src="https://epradar.eu/en/embed/vote-184393" width="100%" height="680" style="border:0;max-width:640px" title="Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy" loading="lazy"></iframe>

How each group voted

EPP129 · 5 · 10

S&D109 · 0 · 0

PfE0 · 31 · 38

ECR1 · 3 · 58

Renew48 · 12 · 3

Greens/EFA43 · 0 · 0

The Left39 · 0 · 0

ESN0 · 1 · 24

NI16 · 1 · 8

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.

Group	For	Abst.	Against	Did not vote	Cohesion
EPP	129	5	10	43	90%
S&D	109	0	0	26	100%
PfE	0	31	38	15	55%
ECR	1	3	58	17	94%
Renew	48	12	3	12	76%
Greens/EFA	43	0	0	10	100%
The Left	39	0	0	7	100%
ESN	0	1	24	2	96%
NI	16	1	8	7	n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs

ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

Winning sideEPP, S&D, Renew, Greens/EFA, The Left
Losing sidePfE, ECR, ESN

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

Country Remember my country in this browser. Nothing is sent to us.

About this vote

Reference: A10-0260/2025
Procedure: 2025/2095(INI)
Committee: EMPL
12 February 2026, 12:25 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 11 February 2026 (verbatim report and video)

Explanations of vote

MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.

Cristian TerheşECR · RomaniaText and video →

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.