Amending the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027
Adopted 490 for · 130 against · 32 abstentions · 67 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 159 | 7 | 6 | 15 | 92% |
| S&D | 116 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 97% |
| PfE | 8 | 6 | 60 | 10 | 81% |
| ECR | 65 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 90% |
| Renew | 66 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 97% |
| Greens/EFA | 46 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 98% |
| The Left | 19 | 3 | 21 | 3 | 49% |
| ESN | 2 | 0 | 24 | 1 | 92% |
| NI | 9 | 4 | 17 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: C10-0023/2026
Procedure: 2025/3500(APP)
Committee: BUDG
11 February 2026, 12:20 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.