Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran
Adopted 524 for · 3 against · 41 abstentions · 151 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 146 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 100% |
| S&D | 109 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 100% |
| PfE | 54 | 7 | 0 | 23 | 88% |
| ECR | 60 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| Renew | 62 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 98% |
| Greens/EFA | 43 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100% |
| ESN | 4 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 84% |
| NI | 9 | 13 | 2 | 8 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: RC-B10-0110/2026
Procedure: 2026/2612(RSP)
Committee:
12 February 2026, 12:16 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.