Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/006 BE/Audi - Belgium
Adopted 593 for · 55 against · 9 abstentions · 62 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 171 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 99% |
| S&D | 123 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| PfE | 61 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 82% |
| ECR | 57 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 78% |
| Renew | 62 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 91% |
| Greens/EFA | 47 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| The Left | 42 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 98% |
| ESN | 2 | 0 | 24 | 1 | 92% |
| NI | 28 | 1 | 2 | 1 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0006/2026
Procedure: 2026/0001(BUD)
Committee: BUDG
11 February 2026, 12:20 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.