European Central Bank - annual report 2025
Adopted 443 for · 71 against · 117 abstentions · 88 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 167 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| S&D | 114 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 99% |
| PfE | 7 | 59 | 4 | 14 | 84% |
| ECR | 21 | 40 | 12 | 6 | 55% |
| Renew | 66 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 98% |
| Greens/EFA | 45 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 14 | 8 | 19 | 5 | 46% |
| ESN | 0 | 4 | 19 | 4 | 83% |
| NI | 9 | 6 | 15 | 2 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0002/2026
Procedure: 2025/2182(INI)
Committee: ECON
10 February 2026, 13:17 · Strasbourg plenary
Debate: 9 February 2026 (verbatim report and video)
Explanations of vote
MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.
- Cristian TerheşECR · RomaniaText and video →
Verbatim report of the European Parliament. © European Union, 2026 - Source: European Parliament.
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.