Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive: Proposal for rejection
Rejected 276 for · 286 against · 30 abstentions · 127 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection. The final vote on this file: Proposal for rejection, 314 to 276 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 4 | 2 | 157 | 21 | 96% |
| S&D | 20 | 18 | 62 | 35 | 62% |
| PfE | 58 | 1 | 7 | 19 | 88% |
| ECR | 28 | 5 | 30 | 21 | 48% |
| Renew | 38 | 0 | 29 | 11 | 57% |
| Greens/EFA | 44 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 92% |
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100% |
| NI | 24 | 0 | 1 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
Decisive: EPP, S&D, ECR. Without the votes of any one of these groups on the winning side, the result would have flipped.
By country
About this vote
Reference: C10-0178/2026
Procedure: 2025/0429(COD)
Committee: LIBE
9 July 2026, 12:34 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (final vote): rejected, 314 for · 276 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.