Votes › 17 June 2026 › A10-0162/2026

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia

Adopted 411 for · 120 against · 120 abstentions · 68 did not vote

Details

The whole chamber

ForAbstainAgainstDid not vote

Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.

Embed this voteHide the code

Copy this code into your page. The card shows the result, the chamber and the groups, with the credit: Parliament Radar by Parleon, CC BY 4.0; data: European Parliament, HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL).

Embed code

<iframe src="https://epradar.eu/en/embed/vote-193952" width="100%" height="680" style="border:0;max-width:640px" title="2025 Commission report on North Macedonia" loading="lazy"></iframe>

How each group voted

EPP151 · 12 · 3

S&D113 · 7 · 0

PfE6 · 1 · 70

ECR14 · 53 · 10

Renew68 · 0 · 0

Greens/EFA46 · 0 · 0

The Left8 · 33 · 2

ESN0 · 3 · 23

NI5 · 11 · 12

ForAbstainAgainstNumbers in the same order. Bar length: MEPs of the group who voted.

Group	For	Abst.	Against	Did not vote	Cohesion
EPP	151	12	3	19	91%
S&D	113	7	0	15	94%
PfE	6	1	70	8	91%
ECR	14	53	10	5	69%
Renew	68	0	0	10	100%
Greens/EFA	46	0	0	7	100%
The Left	8	33	2	2	77%
ESN	0	3	23	1	88%
NI	5	11	12	1	n/a

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

How each country voted

Click a country to see its MEPs

ForAbstainAgainstDid not voteNumbers: for · abstain · against. Bars: all the country's MEPs.

Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.

Winning majority

The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.

Winning sideEPP, S&D, Renew, Greens/EFA
Losing sidePfE, ESN
AbstainedECR, The Left

How often each group is on the winning side →

By country

Country Remember my country in this browser. Nothing is sent to us.

About this vote

Reference: A10-0162/2026
Procedure: 2025/2254(INI)
Committee: AFET
17 June 2026, 13:28 · Strasbourg plenary

Explanations of vote

MEPs who explained their vote orally in plenary, in the order they spoke.

Irena JovevaRenew · SloveniaText and video →

Method

Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.