Generalised scheme of tariff preferences: Proposal for rejection (amendment 131)
Rejected 39 for · 600 against · 16 abstentions · 64 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 131). The final vote on this file: Commission proposal, adopted 459 to 127 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 3 | 0 | 164 | 18 | 98% |
| S&D | 0 | 0 | 124 | 11 | 100% |
| PfE | 6 | 15 | 56 | 8 | 73% |
| ECR | 2 | 0 | 74 | 5 | 97% |
| Renew | 0 | 0 | 71 | 6 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 0 | 45 | 8 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 100% |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 96% |
| NI | 2 | 1 | 23 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A9-0147/2022
Procedure: 2021/0297(COD)
Committee: INTA
28 April 2026, 12:54 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Commission proposal (final vote): adopted, 459 for · 127 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.