Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America
Adopted 417 for · 154 against · 71 abstentions · 76 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 167 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 99% |
| S&D | 90 | 9 | 11 | 25 | 82% |
| PfE | 15 | 17 | 51 | 2 | 61% |
| ECR | 70 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 93% |
| Renew | 52 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 76% |
| Greens/EFA | 18 | 5 | 25 | 5 | 52% |
| The Left | 0 | 1 | 35 | 10 | 97% |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 82% |
| NI | 4 | 4 | 18 | 4 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0069/2026
Procedure: 2025/0261(COD)
Committee: INTA
26 March 2026, 11:24 · Brussels plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Proposal for rejection (amendment 47): rejected, 160 for · 462 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.