Establishing an EU talent pool: Proposal for rejection (amendment 164= 165= 166=)
Rejected 156 for · 462 against · 8 abstentions · 92 did not vote
This vote: Proposal for rejection (amendment 164= 165= 166=). The final vote on this file: Provisional agreement, adopted 414 to 182 →
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 11 | 0 | 152 | 23 | 93% |
| S&D | 0 | 0 | 122 | 13 | 100% |
| PfE | 58 | 7 | 0 | 19 | 89% |
| ECR | 43 | 1 | 29 | 6 | 59% |
| Renew | 0 | 0 | 69 | 7 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 0 | 0 | 46 | 7 | 100% |
| The Left | 0 | 0 | 38 | 8 | 100% |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| NI | 19 | 0 | 6 | 6 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was Against. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0045/2025
Procedure: 2023/0404(COD)
Committee: LIBE
10 March 2026, 13:14 · Strasbourg plenary
Other roll-call votes on this file: Provisional agreement (final vote): adopted, 414 for · 182 against
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.