Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers
Adopted 558 for · 93 against · 18 abstentions · 50 did not vote
Details
The whole chamber
Seating as in the European Parliament chamber, in this order: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and the non-attached members.
How each group voted
| Group | For | Abst. | Against | Did not vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP | 171 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 100% |
| S&D | 131 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| PfE | 8 | 7 | 66 | 3 | 82% |
| ECR | 67 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 87% |
| Renew | 73 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| Greens/EFA | 49 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| ESN | 0 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 95% |
| NI | 18 | 1 | 6 | 3 | n/a |
Source: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
How each country voted
Click a country to see its MEPsSource: European Parliament roll-call votes, via HowTheyVote (ODbL). Collected 8 November 2026.
Winning majority
The winning side was For. Each group's position is the option chosen by most of its members who voted.
By country
About this vote
Reference: A10-0162/2025
Procedure: 2024/0301(COD)
Committee: EMPL, IMCO
20 October 2026, 12:23 · Strasbourg plenary
Method
Cohesion is the share of the group's voting members who followed the group position, the option chosen by most of them. Off the group line: an MEP who voted differently from their group's position. Prepared with AI tools and reviewed by a person before publishing. Report an error: radar@parleon.eu.